5 Comments

  1. I know what he means, it still makes me shudder every time I hear art described as a ‘creative industry’ – being lumped together with those with very different agendas to ours makes no sense. As an artist I have as much in common with someone who designs packaging for MacDonald’s, as I have with anyone doing anything – we’re on the planet together, but that’s about it. I’m guessing that’s what Dunc means, it’s all about the music, not the industry!

  2. (Re: slightly surprising “music industry” question)

    Maybe I’m in some kind of minority, but the distinction being drawn seems obvious enough. I have definitely never thought that “music industry” equates directly to “music and gigs”. Use one of those terms and I think of companies that lend money to a random selection of bands and artists prior to demanding it back, or mobile phone firms that endorse poor-quality venues for big concerts by bands signed to said companies. Use the other and I think of music and gigs.

  3. Glad you brought this up on CiB Chris. It’s a really complex issue and while I don’t feel informed enough to write a huge comment or post about it (yet), I think it’s a debate worth having. I’m glad an established, respected organisation like Capsule put it out there.

  4. Ah, ta for the Birmingham Music questionnaires link – I’ve not been very on top of my RSS reader recently and hadn’t seen them.

    Russ – yeah, that’s pretty much the point. I think the way some people talk about music puts others (with a lot of good experience and useful stuff to say) right off. Using the ‘i’ word is part of that. But then I guess there’s a risk of spending too long fannying around trying to find a form of words/drawing arbitrary lines that offend no-one rather than doing much of any practical use – music politics, eh?

Comments are closed.