The other day someone described CiB as ‘a little ray of sunshine in [their] RSS reader’. I’m going to take time out now to ruin that by talking about funding cuts and such. Sorry. If it’s any consolation I’ll end the post with a picture of a bunny.
The other week West Midlands Regional Observatory brought out their latest recession snapshot. For the cultural sector the figures weren’t bad:
the cultural sector continued to see increases in numbers of customers through the door in the last three months of 2009, building on the unusually high increase in footfall seen over the summer.
Strong audience figures suggest the value placed on culture by the general population has only increased during the economic troubles
However, people are expecting cuts – 72% of respondents being ‘less optimistic’ about the stability of core funding compared to a few years ago. Quite right too – on a daily basis you hear politicians dodging around the c-word like [insert inappropriate simile here].
Jeremy Hunt, the shadow culture secretary, has gone some way towards setting his stall out (could The Guardian have found a pic of him looking any more smug?), saying (and I paraphrase hugely):
- arts administration costs need to be hacked back to 5% of any cash government hands over
- they’ll introduce a US-style culture of philanthropy by encouraging tax breaks on lifetime giving
- The national lottery would be returned to its original good causes (which includes arts)
- they’d get rid of audience development targets in the arts
Some might find encouragement in some of that, although he did add:
I wouldn’t say that everything that happened under the last Conservative government was good
So nevermind.
The philanthropy thing has been jumped upon and was clearly at the forefront of people’s minds on a recent Cultural Leadership Programme session, as blogged about by Friction Arts in a post called Preparing for a Cultural Nuclear Winter.
On the Stan’s Cafe blog James gives the benefit of their experience and says:
Big UK arts institutions are already doing all they can to raise sponsorship and court donors, it’s not as if a funding cut is ‘required’ to prod them into action. […]
In short, the US model is deeply flawed and we are a million miles away from being able to deliver that model as well as they do.
As things stand the figures, for the West Mids in particular, support him, the Birmingham Post pulling the numbers from analysis by Arts & Business. The headline numbers there being that in the West Mids private investment dropped 25% over the last period, while the national average was a drop of 7%.
A&B chief Colin Tweedy said that:
We would like to be optimistic but predict the worst is yet to come
Here’s the bunny:
Bad news overall, particularly the 5% part.
Anyone working in any funding sector (arts/culture, sport, heritage etc) will know that a 5% overhead target is practically unworkable without major cuts and compromises in the quality of the support given to grantholders and applicants.
This will mean wholesale job losses for the sector, without a doubt.
That is one cute bunny
West Midlands Dance links for 3 February 2010
[…] Created in Birmingham – Doom and gloom over arts cuts […]
The bunny brightened my day, even if the article makes for depressing reading…
5% is plenty, as a practicing artist delivering these grant funded projects, I dream of the day when we can afford to put 5% into our overheads, rather than working a 70 hour week and still having to apply for family tax credit. But of course, I’m not bitter at all.
Bridget Riley: Flashback « More Canals than Venice
[…] all the more reason to visit (…and donate)! Created in Birmingham highlighted the difficulties facing the cultural sector just the other day and I also have concerns. The wonderful Urbis in […]